The narrator, makes therefore in its speech one criticizes, that is, the majority was successful, it is the end of the socialist system, and now? Which optimum way to be taken by the people who lived of this system? Some as the narrative quotation ocaso of the Ribbecks that they had obtained to recoup a part the lost money with the exchange change, of the dispute for the lands that for a long period had been considered state and taking of its owners, the narrator still says in them that it knows that of the capitalist side it can gain more money making a lighter work (p.45). We have the presence of the irony and the cultural imposition in diverse stretches of the workmanship, whenever possible the narrator sends in them to this fact, exactly that for this it needs always to come back the things that already had been said. per decades vocs had not been imported with us
Badly the border was opened and the horns already touch this way, (…), in few days obtain with the landmark? hard currency, to steal our calmness (Delius, 1991, p.40) We perceive that a great turn occurs, the narrator now is more direct, it speaks that the people are there for them to steal the calmness, and only to make baguna, that the occidental people want to buy for them with toasts, parties and gratuitous drink. The narrative one passes then to remember the Russians, to imagine what they would be making now that the bipolarization does not exist more and that does not have plus who to oppress or to take the cows, the sheep to them, or to force its women. Now, these men live in a worse situation that of them. A situation where the social displacement is bigger, where the loss of the identity more was affected, a time that the soldiers had gotten used to also live it in that definitive way..