For the construction of this pointer we use given of the IBGE and Treasury department. Analysis: Through the analysis of this pointer we can observe that it had a significant reduction in the amount of people who had had access the PRONAF, when comparative with the number of inhabitants who live in the agricultural areas, in the region North, Northeast and Center-West. This pointer points with respect to the fact of the Pronaf to suffer a problem in its implantation, a time that had a significant reduction in the amount of people who had had access the program, when comparative with the amount of agricultural inhabitants of the northeast region. Program fails in what a constitutional rule is considered: through the Public Politics to reduce of the regional inaqualities of the country. In the region South and Southeastern, in contrast of what they above point the graphs, it had an increase in the number families that the PRONAF has access, when comparative with the number of agricultural inhabitants. This fact can be explained by the fact of that the populations of these regions, theoretically, have more access to the information and are located next the great urban centers, beyond being regions where the familiar activity extremely is organized (valley to remember that the majority of the organized groups that demand better conditions of work for that they live of agriculture are of these regions). In a general way, it had a significant reduction in the number of people who had had access the PRONAF.