In this direction we notice the quo is excellent that the formation politics if gives since infancy so that the children come to become acquired knowledge of its historicidade and understand that they also are constructors of the space in which if they find inserted. We perceive despite the present politicalization inside of this social movement generates criticidade slight knowledge, which will make with that future ' ' without terrinhas' ' , they become militant, such which its parents, and with this they perpetuate the fight in favor of its cause, or better, that continues fighting for the agrarian reform. Following this thought the Edileusa teacher affirms: ' ' In contrast of schools, where the citizens alone repeat what it has been taught, in this space the children participate, give opinion and construct to the knowledge me together with, they not they only are attend, but also they act in the classroom and therefore we learn mutuamente' '. Already a student affirms: ' ' People learn here that people are important in the world and also knows what is ours. The school is very good and I taste excessively of it, because I feel with my friends well always you learning to be I myself and to fight for what he is meu' '. 5. ANALYSIS OF the CASE For ends of this category we will dialogue with the theoreticians having aimed at to think concerning the contribution that the same ones had given in them, as well as also we dialogue with the citizen of the field. With this we try to approach or to become distant practical theory and lived in the MST. The fact of the children to have great power of autonomy makes with that, the same ones become differentiated in relation the majority of the citizens of its age, have seen that Without Terrinha already they participate of the existing meetings in the MST and learn greatly with them, test of this is that they recognize themselves with the age of the Movement Without Land and has pride of this.